Psychotherapy Research in the 1980s: Defining Areas of Consensus and Controversy
Abstract
Psychotherapy research is characterized by slowly accumulated findings, not by dramatic break-throughs. In this review of psychotherapy research methodology, the author identifies eight areas of relative consensus—such as the use of clinical trials, random assignment to treatment conditions, investigation of interaction effects, high statistical power, and integration of process and outcome—as well as areas of controversy. The latter mainly concern disagreements about the usefulness of meta-analysis, the distinction between specific and nonspecific factors, and the choice of comparison groups. Taken together, the areas of consensus, along with the methodological suggestions the literature offers for future research, signal a shift toward studies that are more relevant to clinicians. However, implementation of such studies depends very much on the collaboration of clinicians and researchers.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
