Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Back to table of contents
This Month’s HighlightsFull Access

This Month’s Highlights

Published Online:1 Dec 2014https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.6512TMH

Shared Decision Making

Two research reports, an Open Forum, and two commentaries this month take a closer look at shared decision making. Although this practice is widely promoted and used in general medical care, shared decision making has only recently been regarded as an ethical imperative in mental health care. In a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) study, Stephanie G. Park, Ph.D., and colleagues asked veterans with serious mental illness about the extent to which they wished to engage in shared decision making. Nearly all wanted their prescribing clinician to suggest a range of treatment options and to ask their opinion. Six in ten veterans preferred to rely on providers to make final decisions about care (page Original article: 1409). In another VA study, researchers rated audio recordings of medication appointments to identify moments of shared decision making between consumers and providers. Although Marianne S. Matthias, Ph.D., and colleagues did not find hypothesized associations between higher ratings and a stronger consumer-provider bond, they encourage future researchers to look for more nuanced associations between the therapeutic relationship and shared decisions (page Original article: 1488). In an Open Forum essay, Johannes Hamann, M.D., and Stephan Heres, M.D., argue that standard shared decision making may not be appropriate for all decisions and all patients. For patients with severe mental illness, they propose an adaptation called SDM-PLUS and outline a framework for using it (page Original article: 1483). In a commentary, Patricia E. Deegan, Ph.D., counters that such an adaptation is not needed. She urges practitioners to focus on adoption not adaptation (page Original article: 1487). Finally, in Taking Issue, Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., notes that shared decision making—a concept whose time has come—is “an idea with roots in antiquity.” Citizens of ancient Greece expected to enter into a dialogue with their physician (page Original article: 1399).

Focus on Children and Services

Five articles address issues in service use and delivery among children and adolescents. Ka Ho Brian Chor, Ph.D., and colleagues evaluated the extent to which 346 clinics serving youths and their families took advantage of a range of training opportunities offered by New York State. Thirty-three clinics were “super-adopters” (page Original article: 1439). In an analysis of Medicaid data from 36 states, Ramesh Raghavan, M.D., Ph.D., and colleagues noted that expenditures on psychotropic drugs—especially antidepressants and antimanic drugs—were higher for maltreated children than for other children (page Original article: 1445). Among 1,500 foster care children age six and under, Susan dosReis, Ph.D., and colleagues found that 12% received at least one psychotropic drug. Concomitant use of three or more psychotropics began among children as young as four (page Original article: 1452). Brendan Saloner, Ph.D., and colleagues assessed whether the structure of Medicaid mental health programs makes a difference in rates of second-generation antipsychotic use by children. Use was 31% higher among foster care children in fee-for-service arrangements, and carve-outs were associated with lower use (page Original article: 1458). When Shelly Ben-David, M.S.W., and colleagues listened closely to interviews with 27 young people (ages 16 to 27) with schizophrenia, they noted several themes that differed between males and females. Males said they felt “broken” and described fantasies of escape. Females told stories of family members and described their own struggles to begin careers and adult lives (page Original article: 1499).

Services for Veterans: Three Studies

In a review of medical records for more than 39,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who had received a postdeployment PTSD diagnosis, Shira Maguen, Ph.D., and colleagues found that those who waited longer to get treatment were less likely to experience PTSD symptom improvement. Even with treatment, some subgroups were not as likely as others to improve (page Original article: 1414). In a study of nearly 5,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in five states, Teresa J. Hudson, Pharm.D., and colleagues found that urban or rural residence did not make a difference in whether veterans received routine screening for depression and PTSD. However, rural or urban residence affected rates of diagnosis and treatment—but not in the way that the researchers had hypothesized (page Original article: 1420). Disability payments can reduce incentives for employment and rehabilitation. Marc I. Rosen, M.D., and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial among veterans who had recently applied for service-connected compensation for a psychiatric condition. Some participants received four sessions of a benefits counseling intervention that used motivational interviewing techniques to increase veterans’ desire to work. Six months later, these veterans had significantly more days of paid work than those who did not receive counseling. Attempts to steer applicants toward employment can be effective if begun early, the authors noted (page Original article: 1426).