The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.32.11.795

Traditional psychological measures, diagnostic levels, and biographical and demographic data have all failed as reliable predictors of the outcome for clients in psychiatric rebabilitation programs. An instrument called the Client Adjustment Rating Scales is an attempt to develop a reliable indicator; it consists of nine subscales on which client's attitudes and behaviors in such psychosocial areas as motivation, self-concept, and family functioning can be rated by clinicians. Analysis of the ratings of 89 clients from Horizon House, a community-based psychiatric rehabilitation program in Philadelphia, shows that those who successfully complete rehabilitation programs have higher (more positive) scores on the scales, while program dropouts have lower scores. The authors conclude that after further testing the CARS may be used both as a reliable predictor of client outcome and as a tool for planning rehabilitation programs.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.